“Florida Improvement Co.” is the Florida Development Company under an informal name

The Pabor Lake Pineapple of November–December 1892 gives Oliver M. Crosby’s title as “Manager Florida Improvement Co., Avon Park, Florida” in a directory listing on page 3.[pineapple] Two pages later, in the same issue, the paper’s Bureau of Information directs New York inquiries to “the office of the Florida Development Company, room 99, Franklin street,” and tells callers to “ask for F. E. Sperring, agent for Avon Park lands.”[pineapple] Both entries refer to the same enterprise: one man (Crosby) at the Avon Park end, one agent (Sperring) at the New York end, selling the same land.

The company’s formal name

The company was formally incorporated as the Florida Development Company, Limited in October 1891. According to Leoma Bradshaw Maxwell’s history, Crosby instructed Charles H. Smith, secretary of the Jacksonville Board of Trade, to draw up its charter and by-laws after returning from London that month. The articles of incorporation were filed on October 23, 1891, in the courts of Duval, Marion, and DeSoto counties.[maxwell-1976] Every surviving contemporary source outside the single November–December 1892 directory entry uses the name “Florida Development Company”:

• The Lima Locomotive Works’ construction roster records Shay locomotive shop number 469 as built for “The Florida Development Co.” in November 1894.[shay-roster-469]
• The Savannah Morning News and the Weekly Floridian reported on the company’s incorporation, stockholders’ meetings, and collapse between 1891 and 1897 under the name “Florida Development Company.”[fdc-newspapers]
• The Pabor Lake Pineapple itself, from September 1895 onward, called Crosby “president of the Florida Development company.”[pineapple]
• The Avon Park townsite plat, printed in Maxwell’s centennial history, is signed by Crosby as “President Florida Development Company.”[maxwell-1976]
• Smith v. Wilson, 71 So. 919 (Fla. 1916), a Supreme Court of Florida ejectment action over Avon Park town lots, names the Florida Development Company in the chain of title.[smith-v-wilson]

Why “Florida Improvement Co.” appears

Evidence: single-source. The name “Florida Improvement Co.” occurs in exactly one place in the surviving record: the directory entry on page 3 of the combined November–December 1892 issue of the Pabor Lake Pineapple.[pineapple] No incorporation record, no deed, no newspaper report, and no legal proceeding uses this name for Crosby’s company. No second entity by that name has been found in connection with Avon Park or DeSoto County.

A search of the Florida Division of Corporations (Sunbiz) returned no “Florida Improvement Co.” associated with Avon Park. The unrelated statewide “Florida Improvement Company” of the 1870s and 1880s — led by J. J. Dunne and active in the Hamilton Disston era — predates Crosby’s enterprise by a decade and had no connection to DeSoto County or the Lake Wales Ridge settlements.

The most likely explanation is that the compositor or editor of the Pineapple’s directory block substituted “Improvement” for “Development,” either from the generic vocabulary of the era’s land companies or by confusion with the better-known statewide firm. “Improvement” companies were ubiquitous in late-nineteenth-century Florida promotion, and the two words were close enough in the industry’s lexicon to produce an unintentional swap in a small-circulation monthly set by hand. The error was not repeated: when the Pineapple next gave Crosby a corporate title, in September 1895, it was as president of the Florida Development Company.[pineapple]

Conclusion

“Florida Improvement Co.” and “Florida Development Company” refer to the same entity. There was one company, incorporated in October 1891, operating under the formal name Florida Development Company, Limited. The single variant in the November–December 1892 directory listing does not represent a separate organization.

References

• pineapple — W. E. Pabor and E. A. Pabor. Pabor Lake Pineapple, October 1892 to September 1897. 15 September 1897. pabor-lake-pineapple.md
• maxwell-1976 — Leoma Bradshaw Maxwell. The First Hundred Years of Avon Park, Florida. 1976. the-first-hundred-years-of-avon-park_leoma-bradshaw-maxwell_1976.md
• shay-roster-469 — shaylocomotives.com. Lima Shay Shop Number 469 factsheet. 22 February 2020. https://www.shaylocomotives.com/data/factsheet/sn-469.htm
• fdc-newspapers — contemporary Florida and Georgia newspapers, via digitized collections. Savannah Morning News and Weekly Floridian reports on the Florida Development Company, 1891-1897. 1897. https://ufdc.ufl.edu
• smith-v-wilson — Supreme Court of Florida. Smith v. Wilson, 71 So. 919 (Fla. 1916). 1916. https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=smith+v.+wilson+71+So.+919

Related

• Entity: Florida Development Company
• Entity: Oliver Marvin Crosby
• Entity: Frank E. Sperring
• Reference: Pabor Lake Pineapple, 1892–1897
• Reference: The First Hundred Years of Avon Park
• Finding: The Florida Development Company, Avon Park Transportation Company, and Burleigh sawmill nexus

Where this comes from

Evidence

single-source — One source. Treat as reported, not established.

Review

unverified — Drafted from sources but not yet checked by a volunteer.

Rights

society

Sources

1. W. E. Pabor and E. A. Pabor, Pabor Lake Pineapple, October 1892 to September 1897 (1897)
2. Leoma Bradshaw Maxwell, The First Hundred Years of Avon Park, Florida (references/the-first-hundred-years-of-avon-park_leoma-bradshaw-maxwell_1976.md) (1976) · book
3. shaylocomotives.com, Lima Shay Shop Number 469 factsheet (2020)
4. contemporary Florida and Georgia newspapers, via digitized collections, Savannah Morning News and Weekly Floridian reports on the Florida Development Company, 1891-1897 (1897)
5. Supreme Court of Florida, Smith v. Wilson, 71 So. 919 (Fla. 1916) (1916) · official

Something here wrong, or incomplete? The Society would rather know. Tell a volunteer.

Have a question about this record?Ask A.P.

← Back to collection